Match statistics snapshot
- GIF Sundsvall created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.51, Δ 0.05).
- Degerfors IF fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.51 |
| 0 | Offsides | 0 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 405 | Accurate passes | 436Lead |
| 474 | Total passes | 514Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.