Match statistics snapshot
- GIF Sundsvall created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 1.45, Δ 0.02).
- Helsingborg fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- GIF Sundsvall was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 605Lead |
| 377 | Total passes | 694Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gif Sundsvall | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.