Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 2.50, Δ 0.47).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.50Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 291 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 378 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |