Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 3.19, Δ 2.73).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.19Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 296 | Accurate passes | 465Lead |
| 382 | Total passes | 543Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.