Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.55, Δ 0.43).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- FC Porto was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 267 | Accurate passes | 428Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 489Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.35 | Goals prevented | 0.35 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |