Match statistics snapshot
- Rio Ave created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 2.60, Δ 2.15).
- Rio Ave fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Rio Ave was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.60Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 524Lead | Total passes | 367 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gil Vicente | Statistic | Rio Ave |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |