Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9Lead |
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 203 | Accurate passes | 213Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 341Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Accrington St |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |