Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 306Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |