Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 0.87, Δ 0.26).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 207 | Accurate passes | 226Lead |
| 327Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |