Match statistics snapshot
- Barrow fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 284Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 392Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.