Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 1.78, Δ 0.37).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.78 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 43% |
| 298Lead | Accurate passes | 99 |
| 447Lead | Total passes | 230 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.