Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (2.43 vs 0.99, Δ 1.44).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 2.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 58%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 184Lead | Accurate passes | 152 |
| 317Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.