Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 1.63, Δ 0.03).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Colchester was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Colchester |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.63 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Colchester |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 240Lead |
| 251 | Total passes | 328Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Colchester |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Colchester |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Colchester |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.