Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (2.66 vs 2.20, Δ 0.46).
- Crawley Town fired more attempts (20 vs 17 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 2.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.20 |
| 6 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 131 | Accurate passes | 328Lead |
| 221 | Total passes | 389Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.