Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Forest Green was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
- Gillingham held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 340Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Forest Green |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.