Match statistics snapshot
- Oldham created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 2.10, Δ 1.11).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Oldham was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.10Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 305Lead | Accurate passes | 178 |
| 405Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Oldham |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.