Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
2 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 0Lead |
12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
4 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
14Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 13 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
51% | Pass accuracy | 62%Lead |
127 | Accurate passes | 170Lead |
247 | Total passes | 273Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
3 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 4Lead |
1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Gillingham leads this block
Gillingham leads shot accuracy (+225% vs Salford City)
Gillingham leads shot accuracy (+225% vs Salford City)
Gillingham leads box penetration (+24% vs Salford City)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Gillingham leads this block
Salford City — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Salford City — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Gillingham leads this block
Gillingham leads territorial pressure (+34% vs Salford City)
Gillingham leads territorial pressure (+34% vs Salford City)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Salford City leads this block
Salford City had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.
Salford City leads (26.0 vs 21.0).
Salford City leads (32.2 vs 24.5).
Gillingham leads (17.0 vs 14.0).
Salford City leads (25.0 vs 22.0).