Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 51% | Pass accuracy | 62%Lead |
| 127 | Accurate passes | 170Lead |
| 247 | Total passes | 273Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.