Match statistics snapshot
- Shrewsbury fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 220Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 307Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |