Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 0.80, Δ 0.09).
- Gillingham fired more attempts (8 vs 6 shots).
- Walsall was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| Offsides | ||
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 226Lead | Accurate passes | 159 |
| 330Lead | Total passes | 265 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |