Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- Gillingham was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 4Lead |
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 59%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 185Lead | Accurate passes | 176 |
| 311Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gillingham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |