Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 7 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target |
| 5Lead |
| 10 | Shots outside the box | 10 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 243 | Accurate passes | 256Lead |
| 362Lead | Total passes | 355 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |