Match statistics snapshot
- Gimnasia L.P.
- created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 1.31, Δ 0.74).
- Velez Sarsfield held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 192 | Accurate passes | 312Lead |
| 287 | Total passes | 397Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gimnasia L.p. | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |