Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 1.24, Δ 0.49).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Almere City FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 67%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 266Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 395Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |