Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (2.20 vs 2.80, Δ 0.60).
- GO Ahead Eagles fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.80Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Go Ahead Eagles | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |