Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas created the clearer chances on xG (0.39 vs 0.70, Δ 0.31).
- Goias fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Goias | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Goias | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 311Lead |
| 237 | Total passes | 370Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Goias | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Goias | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Goias | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |