Match statistics snapshot
- Goias created the clearer chances on xG (1.61 vs 0.49, Δ 1.12).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Goias was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Goias | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.61Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Goias | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 194 | Accurate passes | 199Lead |
| 292Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Goias | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Goias | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Goias | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |