Match statistics snapshot
- Granada CF fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Eldense was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 322Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Eldense |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |