Match statistics snapshot
- Granada CF created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 1.06, Δ 1.05).
- Rayo Vallecano fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Granada CF was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Rayo Vallecano |
|---|---|---|
2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 1.06 |
0Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 3 |
7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
1 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
9 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 18Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Rayo Vallecano |
|---|---|---|
40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
245 | Accurate passes | 404Lead |
319 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Rayo Vallecano |
|---|---|---|
3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Rayo Vallecano |
|---|---|---|
2 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 6Lead |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Granada Cf | Statistic | Rayo Vallecano |
|---|---|---|
19 | Fouls | 9Lead |
0 | Red cards | 0 |
0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Granada Cf leads this block
Granada Cf leads shot accuracy (+200% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Granada Cf leads shot accuracy (+200% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Granada Cf leads shot quality (+298% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Granada Cf leads box penetration (+17% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Granada Cf leads possession efficiency (+199% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Granada Cf leads possession efficiency (+199% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Granada Cf — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Rayo Vallecano leads this block
Rayo Vallecano leads territorial pressure (+80% vs Granada Cf)
Rayo Vallecano leads territorial pressure (+80% vs Granada Cf)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Granada Cf leads this block
Granada Cf — stronger shot quality allowed
Granada Cf — stronger shot quality allowed
Granada Cf leads keeper workload (+51% vs Rayo Vallecano)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Granada Cf leads this block
Granada Cf had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Granada Cf leads (19.0 vs 15.0).
Rayo Vallecano leads (51.0 vs 30.8).
Rayo Vallecano leads (23.0 vs 10.0).
Granada Cf leads (0.234 vs 0.059).
Granada Cf leads (94.1 vs 76.6).
Granada Cf leads (21.0 vs 18.0).