Match statistics snapshot
- FC Basel 1893 created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.36, Δ 0.64).
- FC Basel 1893 fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- FC Basel 1893 was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Basel 1893 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Basel 1893 |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 300 | Accurate passes | 390Lead |
| 377 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Basel 1893 |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Basel 1893 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Basel 1893 |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.