Match statistics snapshot
- FC Lugano created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 1.89, Δ 1.19).
- FC Lugano fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Grasshoppers was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.89Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 242 | Total passes | 539Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |