Match statistics snapshot
- Grasshoppers created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 0.78, Δ 0.43).
- FC Lugano fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Grasshoppers was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 170 | Accurate passes | 556Lead |
| 250 | Total passes | 635Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.56 | Goals prevented | 0.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Lugano |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.