Match statistics snapshot
- FC Luzern created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.58, Δ 0.22).
- FC Luzern fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Grasshoppers was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Luzern |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Luzern |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 354Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 444Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Luzern |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Luzern |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Luzern |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |