Match statistics snapshot
- Grasshoppers created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 1.34, Δ 1.05).
- Grasshoppers fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- FC Winterthur was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 336Lead | Accurate passes | 317 |
| 403Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Winterthur |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |