Match statistics snapshot
- FC Zurich created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 1.93, Δ 0.36).
- FC Zurich fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- FC Zurich was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.93Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 227 | Accurate passes | 330Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |