Match statistics snapshot
- FC Zurich created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 2.79, Δ 1.50).
- FC Zurich fired more attempts (24 vs 10 shots).
- FC Zurich was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.79Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 13Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 215 | Accurate passes | 337Lead |
| 307 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Fc Zurich |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.