Match statistics snapshot
- Grasshoppers created the clearer chances on xG (3.01 vs 1.48, Δ 1.53).
- Grasshoppers was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 28%).
- Grasshoppers held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Servette Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Servette Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 366Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 376 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Servette Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Servette Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Servette Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |