Match statistics snapshot
- Grasshoppers created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 1.04, Δ 0.12).
- Yverdon Sport fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Grasshoppers was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Yverdon Sport |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Yverdon Sport |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Yverdon Sport |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Yverdon Sport |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grasshoppers | Statistic | Yverdon Sport |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.