Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC fired more attempts (25 vs 10 shots).
- Grazer AK was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 28%).
- Wolfsberger AC held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grazer Ak | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grazer Ak | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 122 | Accurate passes | 532Lead |
| 210 | Total passes | 636Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grazer Ak | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grazer Ak | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grazer Ak | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |