Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (1.86 vs 1.74, Δ 0.12).
- Ceara fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
Gremio vs Ceara
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 419Lead | Accurate passes | 229 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 319 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.16 | Goals prevented | 1.16 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |