Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 1.22, Δ 0.46).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 331 | Accurate passes | 493Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |