Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 0.94, Δ 0.47).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 216 | Accurate passes | 647Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 713Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |