Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 0.50, Δ 0.55).
- Gremio fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 419Lead |
| 424 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 0.96 | Goals prevented | 0.96 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |