Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 1.18, Δ 0.16).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 298 | Accurate passes | 482Lead |
| 349 | Total passes | 537Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.85 | Goals prevented | -0.85 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |