Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (0.60 vs 0.92, Δ 0.32).
- Gremio fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.60 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 455Lead | Accurate passes | 361 |
| 507Lead | Total passes | 433 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.18 | Goals prevented | -0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |