Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 1.07, Δ 0.21).
- Gremio fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 406 | Accurate passes | 416Lead |
| 466 | Total passes | 476Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.90 | Goals prevented | 0.90 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |