Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.92, Δ 0.75).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Gremio held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.92Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 342 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 403 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 0.50 | Goals prevented | 0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |