Match statistics snapshot
- Remo created the clearer chances on xG (0.70 vs 1.92, Δ 1.22).
- Gremio fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.92Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 454Lead | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |