Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (2.79 vs 0.97, Δ 1.82).
- Gremio fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gremio | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| Offsides | ||
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gremio | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 556Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 617Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gremio | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gremio | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.37 | Goals prevented | 1.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gremio | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |