Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 375 | Accurate passes | 413Lead |
| 458 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.