Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 20%).
- Grenoble held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 360Lead | Accurate passes | 327 |
| 435Lead | Total passes | 400 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Grenoble | Statistic | Clermont Foot |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |